Our Mission  Contact Us  Subscribe Media Kit  Previous Issues  Web Links 

California Approved
Methods to Prevent and Reduce Indoor Air Pollution

There are a number of methods that can be used to prevent or reduce indoor air pollution, but the most effective approach is to remove or reduce indoor emissions by using building materials, consumer products, and appliances that emit little or no air pollution.

Though more pollutants are emitted outdoors, once emitted, indoor air pollutants are diluted much more slowly, due to the partial trapping effect of the building shell. Additionally, indoor emissions occur in closer proximity to people, and pollutants emitted indoors have a 1000-fold greater chance of being inhaled than do those emitted outdoors, according to the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which has adopted a guide for control of IAQ and IAP.

The most effective approach is to remove or reduce indoor emissions by using building materials, consumer products, and appliances that emit little or no air pollution.

The first thing CARB says is that ventilation (including proper exhaust ducting) and public education are important components of a strong indoor air quality improvement program.
• Source control is the most reliable approach to prevent indoor pollution because it does not depend on building maintenance or other human actions to assure healthful indoor air, says CARB. Source control includes source substitution, source removal and source modification.

Reduction at the source is most effectively achieved through use of low- or zero emitting appliances, products or materials, or reformulation of chemical products. For example, indoor formaldehyde levels can be greatly reduced by using building materials that emit little or no formaldehyde, instead of materials made with urea-formaldehyde resins. Low emission product designs or reformulations can usually be accomplished by the manufacturer, with minimal impact on the consumer, often with only minor increased costs.

• Ventilation is a standard engineering approach to assuring good indoor air quality and comfort. Ventilation removes and dilutes indoor contaminants, removes moisture from the air, which helps to prevent mold growth, and removes effluents such as carbon dioxide that lead to a stuffy
environment.

Natural ventilation through open windows and doors is the primary ventilation route for residences, while mechanical ventilation, using HVAC systems, is most common in commercial
buildings. Adequate and effective ventilation, and ducting of exhaust from combustion appliances, are necessary for acceptable indoor air quality, even when known air contaminants are minimized.

However, ventilation is not a complete solution to indoor pollution: ventilation consumes energy, and some pollutants, such as formaldehyde emitted from building materials, require years to off-gas and are not completely removed by ventilation.
• Proper operation and maintenance of buildings is critical to achieving and maintaining healthful air quality in buildings.

Ventilation systems should be maintained as intended and filters replaced routinely to prevent soiling and the growth of mold and bacteria in the ventilation system and in the occupied space.
Roof leaks that are not repaired promptly can lead to moisture intrusion and mold growth.

Regular cleaning of indoor spaces with proper cleaning methods can reduce biological contaminants, such as those associated with insects and pollen, as well as persistent chemicals. Inattention to proper operation and maintenance will not only lead to poor indoor air quality, but can also prove more costly in the long term due to increased costs to remedy the
larger problems that result.
• Public education is a key step for reducing Californians’ exposures to many indoor air pollutants. People’s choices and activities have a major impact on their exposures to air pollution. The use of various consumer products and activities such as cigarette smoking and cooking can result in significant indoor releases of pollutants. However, public education alone is not a complete solution.

Some groups of the population cannot respond appropriately to take needed action. For example, children cannot read or understand all written information that is provided; elderly people living in group settings cannot control the products used in their facility; and low-income
families may not be able to afford safer alternatives.

• Air cleaning devices can also help improve indoor air quality; however, their effectiveness is often limited. Air cleaning devices include both central air filters and portable air cleaning appliances.

Air filters are a normal component of mechanical HVAC systems in public and commercial buildings. High efficiency particulate arrestor (HEPA) filters, though not commonly used in
commercial buildings, are most effective at removing particles from outdoor air as it is brought indoors. Air cleaning appliances are usually portable units used indoors to remove particles from the indoor air, although a few remove gases, and some remove both particles and gases.

Mechanical air cleaners typically draw air through a filter while electronic air cleaners remove pollutants with the use of an electric charge.

Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and ionizers are the two major types of electronic air cleaners on the market. The proper air cleaner may help control airborne particles in some situations; however, the limited scientific evidence available has not documented any health benefits from air cleaners.

Problems in Schools
CARB reports that the primary problems of IAP found in schools include:
• Inadequate ventilation with outdoor air during 40 percent of class hours, and seriously deficient ventilation 10 percent of the time. This is often due to teachers turning off HVAC systems because of excessive noise.
• Formaldehyde air concentrations exceeded guideline levels for preventing acute eye, nose, and throat irritation in about 4 percent of the classrooms; nearly all classrooms exceeded guidelines
for preventing long-term health effects, including cancer.
• Obvious mold in about 3 percent of classrooms, and water stains and other potential mold indicators in about one third of classrooms, due to inadequate maintenance.
• Noise levels in all classrooms exceeded 35 decibels, a voluntary standard for classrooms; one-half of the classrooms also exceeded 55 decibels, the level used for outdoor nuisance regulations.

Excess noise was primarily attributable to noisy ventilation systems. Cal/OSHA’s workplace regulations related to ventilation, moisture intrusion, and other aspects of building operation
and maintenance. Schools should conduct a self-assessment and implement an indoor air quality management program, like that in U.S. EPA’s IAQ Tools for Schools Program, recommends CARB.
Also consider:
• Develop and promote “Best Practices” for design, construction, operation and maintenance of school facilities. The CHPS manuals provide comprehensive guidance at no charge.
• Improve support (both funding and training) for school facilities and staff.
Stable, long-term funding mechanisms are needed to assure adequate and timely operation and maintenance.
Postponed maintenance often results in greater costs. Focused training programs for administrators, facility managers, and teachers are needed: those closest to the classroom are often not aware of current “best practices” for operation and maintenance of classrooms. FSM

Valtronics

Graphic Procuts

Miller Fall Protection

Ryder Fleet Products

Hogan Assessments

Seton

Maico Diagnostics

Training Network

SlipNOT

 


 


 
 

© 2008 Facility Safety Management - All Rights Reserved - Get Adobe Reader