|
|
|
First
Response |
AIHA Comments on OSHA Reform Legislation
The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) is concerned
about changes to the Occupational Safety and Health Act, by way of a
letter to Sen. Michael Enzi (R-WY), chairman of the
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Offering comments on one bill from his long-awaited package of
occupational health and safety legislation, AIHA sees the
“Occupational Safety Fairness Act” (S. 2066) as a bill that would
provide numerous changes to the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970.
AIHA is interested in any amendments to the OSH Act that may have an
impact on the health and safety of workers. Most of the issues Sen.
Enzi addresses in S. 2066 have a direct impact on worker health and
safety, while others more directly address the process used by the
Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
AIHA previously provided comments on the other two bills
(“Occupational Safety Partnership Act,” S. 2065 and “HazCom
Simplification and Modernization Act of 2005,” S. 2067) in the OSHA
reform package of Sen. Enzi. The full text of AIHA’s letter is
available at www.aiha.org under “Government Affairs.”
For more information regarding AIHA’s comments to Sen. Enzi or other
questions concerning AIHA Government Affairs, contact Aaron Trippler,
AIHA director of government affairs, at (703) 846-
0730 or atrippler@aiha.org.
Lack of Engineering Controls Blamed For Explosion
The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is
blaming a lack of engineering controls, process hazards and
untreated window glass for an explosion and injuries at a medical
products sterilization facility in Ontario, CA, in August 2004.
In its final investigation report into the explosion that injured
four employees and severely damaged the facility, disrupting its
operations for nine months, the CSB says the explosion and injuries
at Sterigenics International Inc. occurred when ethylene oxide gas,
used for medical product sterilization, was ignited by the flames in
a pollution control device called a catalytic oxidizer.
“Our investigation revealed several factors that led to the
explosion,” said CSB Lead Investigator Randy McClure. “The company
did not conduct a thorough explosion hazard analysis, did not
ensure that a maintenance supervisor with the authority to override
safety systems understood the potential dangers involved in the
process, and did not have adequate engineering controls in place to
prevent an explosion.”
The investigation determined that the ethylene oxide, which is
highly explosive, was not properly removed from the sterilization
chamber because a maintenance supervisor authorized technicians to
bypass a critical safety step, called “gas washing.”
In addition, investigators determined that Sterigenics did not
ensure that the maintenance supervisor understood the hazards of the
process before entrusting him with the authority to bypass critical
safety systems.
The report also noted that the facility was not designed with
engineering controls such as explosive concentration monitoring
systems, which would have prevented the explosive gas from reaching
the catalytic oxidizer. Other CSB findings indicated that
Sterigenics did not conduct a thorough explosion hazard analysis, or
adopt earlier recommendations from the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA).
Those recommendations stated that sterilization facilities should
address the explosion hazard presented by catalytic oxidizers by
implementing additional engineering controls.
CSB Board Member John Bresland said, “Oxidizers are commonly used
for reducing air pollution. However, they have been the source of
many explosions. There is a serious risk if the fuel-air mixture
is too concentrated. Facilities with oxidizers should use multiple
layers of protection - such as gas monitors, safety interlocks, and
alarms - to prevent a single mistake from leading to an explosion.”
The Board recommended that the NFPA, which creates fire codes used
widely around the country, require additional safeguards to prevent
explosions at ethylene oxide facilities, specifically: gas
concentration monitoring equipment, alarms, and explosion damage
control devices. The Board recommended that Sterigenics install
similar safety devices and improve its employee training and hazard
analysis programs.
The CSB has produced a video report on the incident, including a
computer-generated animation describing the accident scenario as
well as CSB safety recommendations, which may be viewed at the
agency’s website, CSB.gov. A DVD including this and six other CSB
safety videos may be obtained at no charge by filling out a request
form on the website. For more, go to
www.csb.gov.
Manufacturing, Production Jobs Have Highest Eye
Injury Rates
New research brings the impact of eye safety at work into sharp
focus. According to the U.S. Dept. of Labor’s Bureau of Labor
Statistics, more than 36,000 eye injuries occurred in the American
workplace
in 2004.
The report also showed that manufacturing or production jobs had the
highest eye injury rates, followed by installation, maintenance and
repair, and construction.
Men comprised 80 percent of the eye injury total and those aged
25-34 reported the most eye injuries.
Many of these injuries occurred after being struck by an object or
after rubbing the eye once debris had entered it.
The good news, according to Prevent Blindness America, is that 90
percent of all job-related eye injuries can be prevented simply by
wearing the proper protection. Only eye protection that has been
certified by the American National Standards Institute should be
used and must have “ANSI Z87” clearly stamped on the frame or lens.
“It is vital for employers and employees to make eye safety a number
one priority every single day,” said Daniel D. Garrett, senior vice
president of Prevent Blindness America. “Even the most skilled and
experienced workers can be involved in an unforeseen accident and
have their vision altered forever.”
Because most of these potentially blinding injuries can be
prevented, Prevent Blindness America created the Wise Owl program.
The program offers safety education materials to employers so their
employees are prepared to avoid eye accidents and recognizes
companies and individuals
who have saved vision through dedication to eye protection.
As of 2003, the U.S. Dept. of Labor estimates that eye injuries
total more than $300 million a year in lost production time, medical
expenses and worker compensation.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires
that employers ensure the safety of all employees in the work
environment, including providing eye and face protection whenever
necessary.
Prevent Blindness America designated March as “Workplace Eye Health
and Safety Month” in an effort to raise awareness about the
necessity of eye safety on the job. It offers the following tips to
promote
safety in the workplace:
• Safety eyewear must have “ANSI Z87” clearly marked on all glasses
or goggles and should be worn at all times whenever eye hazards are
present.
• Workers should know where the nearest eye wash station is at their
job site and how to use it.
• Employers should be notified immediately if safety hazards are
discovered.
• Employees should have regular eye exams to make sure their vision
is adequate to do their jobs safely.
• Those who already have reduced vision should ask their employers
if prescription glasses or goggles can be provided.
Prevent Blindness America offers several free fact sheets and
brochures to safety managers and consumers including Eye Safety is
No Accident, Questions on Eye Safety at Work and Workplace
Safety Quiz. Employers may also request information on the Wise Owl
safety education program by calling 1-800-331-2020.
Green Seal Releases Draft of Green Cleaning
Services Standard
Green Seal has announced the availability of its proposed
Environmental Standard for Cleaning Services for public review and
comment until Tuesday, May 2, 2006.
Both the draft Standard and an accompanying background document are
posted on the non-profit organization’s Web site at
www.greenseal.org/draftdocs.htm.
Comments on the Standard should be directed to: Jack Geibig,
director of the Center for
Clean Products and Clean Technologies at the University of
Tennessee, Attn: Green Seal Cleaning Services Standard, email:
cvanriper@mindspring.com, or by Postal Mail/Overnight Courier: Jack
Geibig UT Center for Clean Products, 311 Conference Center Bldg.
Knoxville, TN 37996, or fax: (865) 974-1838 (please, no more than 10
pages).
“All comments received from the public review will be considered and
responded to in a comment-response document that also will be made
available.
The proposed Standard will be revised and the Stakeholder Committee
will review both the comment-response document and draft final
Standard,” said Arthur Weissman, Ph.D., president and
CEO of Green Seal.
“The Stakeholder Committee consists of representatives from product
and equipment manufacturers, trade associations, government
agencies, building service contractors, building owners and
operators, public-interest organizations and institutions such as
universities.
“The Stakeholder Committee will vote on the draft final Standard. If
necessary, further revisions will be made in order toachieve
consensus. The final Standard will then be issued, sent to all
Stakeholder participants, and posted on Green Seal’s Web site.”
The final version of the Standard is expected to be released in June
2006. Estonian Art Museum Installs Gas Detection System Honeywell
Analytics, a manufacturer of toxic and flammable gas and fire
detection systems, has supplied a ‘masterpiece’ of gas detection to
the new main building of the Art Museum of Estonia, the Kumu Art
Museum, in Tallinn.
Honeywell Analytics’ Sensepoint gas detectors and Unipoint
controllers being used to monitor for potential fire hazards, hang
as an integral part of the building management system of the Kumu
complex.
The units are part of the cost-effective and easy-to-use Zareba
range of fixed gas detection systems for industrial and commercial
applications.
The Sensepoint flammable gas detector is equipped with the Honeywell
Analytics’ proprietary Surecell electrochemical sensing technology
and poison-resistant catalytic beads. It has easily replaceable
sensors and offers users a low cost solution to their gas monitoring
needs, indoors or outdoors.
The Unipoint DIN rail mounted controller enables users to easily
expand and maintain the detection system without interrupting
neighboring devices. It can be installed into any plastic or metal
enclosure
for use indoors or outdoors and even in potentially explosive
atmospheres.
The seven-story Kumu building opened its doors to the public on Feb.
18, 2006 and houses the largest permanent exhibition of Estonian art
in the world with exhibition halls spanning 5,000 square
meters. The museum has over 55,000 art objects in its collection, of
which 1,500 are on display at any one time, and meets all the
international museum standards that enable it to bring valuable
works to
Estonia from abroad.
“This cultural, world-class project with The Art Museum of Estonia
has been a great opportunity for Honeywell Analytics” says Chris
Cottrell, vice president of sales and marketing. “As one of the most
spectacular museums in Europe, we are proud to be a part of this
ambitious project.”
DuPont Installs Solar Panels to Study Renewable
Energy
DuPont has announced the launch of a solar energy program at its
Chestnut Run facilities to further its research in next generation
solar panel technology.
The company has installed three rows of large photovoltaic solar
panels to convert the sun’s energy into electricity for an existing
R&D and business facility at the site. The system, which can provide
enough electricity for eight homes, was installed by WorldWater &
Power Corp. The solar panels were made by GE Energy in Newark, DE.
The system is being equally funded by DuPont and a Green Energy Fund
grant from the Delaware Energy Office.
“Our primary focus is to lower the energy cost by improving the
efficiency and lifetime of solar panels,” said Cynthia C. Green,
DuPont Fluoroproducts vice president and general manager. “Studying
the
on-site panels will allow us to do just that, using an installed
commercial system. We are also looking for ways to provide better
installations with better design capabilities. Our goal is to have
something that is ultimately integrated into a system that is
lighter weight, easier to install and better integrated with
building design.”
DuPont Chairman and CEO Charles O. Holliday, Jr. said, “This is a
great example of our science and innovation providing materials that
enable businesses and consumers to convert sunlight directly into
electricity. Our ‘One DuPont’ offering across businesses provides
sustainable business solutions that will give us a competitive
advantage in the growing market space of renewable energy
technology.”
DuPont has made a corporate commitment to have at least 10 percent
of its power produced by renewable energy sources by 2010, some of
which will be supplied through solar panel technology.
Today, more than 5 percent of its power is produced by renewable
energy sources. Solar panels convert light into electrical energy
through the use of photovoltaic solar cells. The cell assemblies
are encapsulated into water-resistant panels for protection from
moisture and impact. The company has plans to invest approximately
$100 million to expand its product offerings in this rapidly
growing market.
With better efficiency, DuPont expects that the cost for solar
panels will begin to decrease, in turn reducing the cost per watt of
power produced for a business or home. While the solar panels are
still expensive, the purchase of solar panels guarantees an
electricity supply for residential
homes for at least 25 years.
The principal components of a solar panel include glass,
encapsulate, silicon wafers and associated metallization and
circuitry, and a protective backsheet. With the exception of the
silicon, DuPont provides technological solutions for each component.
Airgas Wins CGA Bulk Gas Fleet Safety Award
Airgas, Inc., a distributor of industrial, medical and specialty
gases and safety products, has been awarded the Bulk Gas Fleet
Safety Award by the Compressed Gas Association (CGA), recognizing
its best safety record among bulk fleets with more than 20 million
miles driven in 2005.
CGA bases its Fleet Safety Awards on a CGA member’s total vehicle
accident frequency rate per million miles driven.
Two awards honor bulk gas fleets with more than 20 million miles
driven and those fleets with less than 20 million miles driven. Two
more awards go to the cylinder vehicle fleets with more and less
than 3 million miles driven.
This was the first year that Airgas bulk drivers surpassed the
20-million milestone to compete among the industry’s largest bulk
gas fleets. Airgas, which has the largest cylinder delivery fleet
among CGA
members, won the CGA Cylinder Fleet Safety Award in 2001 and 2002.
“While Airgas is proud to have won the Cylinder Fleet Safety Award
twice, this is our first honor for those drivers who deliver bulk
atmospheric, carbon dioxide and dry ice,” said Airgas Chairman and
CEO Peter McCausland. “Our safety performance in the last year
demonstrates that we are growing this segment of our business in the
right way.”
In accepting the award at the CGA annual meeting last week in Fort
Lauderdale, FL, McCausland singled out Duane Young, director of
SAFECOR, and John Anderson, director of DOT operations,
who coordinates fleet safety training for Airgas. SAFECOR is the
Airgas department responsible for coordinating safety, compliance,
and regulatory affairs.
“In 2005, nearly 3,000 Airgas drivers drove about 80 million miles,
including 25 million bulk miles and 38 million cylinder miles,” said
Young. “Even though we have more vehicles driving more miles than in
past years, Airgas drivers have focused on lowering preventable and
total vehicle accident rates
during the past year. We are especially proud of the performance of
our bulk drivers, who had a total accident rate of just 1.38 per
million miles driven.”
|
|
|