“There’s been quite an evolution in gas detection,
between features, functions, and technology,” says Kay Mangieri,
director Industrial Scientific Corporation, Oakdale, PA. “In fact,
huge advances
have been made.”
There have been, Mangieri explains, major
improvements in not only the workings of the sensor itself, the
“heart” of the detection device, but also new iterations of design
have introduced and refined
chip technology so it can transmit data to computers anywhere.
Moreover, the basic chip technology has been electrochemical, but,
Mangieri says, there has been an increasing acceptance of newer
even more precise technologies.
These include infrared, acoustic wave, ionization and wireless
technologies. These newer options are in various degrees of
acceptance mainly due to cost.
But as with most, technologies that are largely cost prohibitive
when first introduced, come down in price as they become more
established.
“There have also been developments in the battery technologies, in
the software, gas monitors and other related
products,” Mangieri says. “You now have data input, data logging,
and data output capabilities. You can combine not only gas but also
user, location, and even temperature information.”
She adds thatyou can have all this data when and where you want it.
If there is an incident on site, all of the data has gone into
records off site.
The machine has taken over the task of calibrating the meter.
Instead of having to push a button, the automated docking station
can do that. The charging of the instrument through various stages
and the
record keeping are automatic. With calibration you can do a quick
“bump” test, and then calibrate it to test daily or do a full
calibration every month or within any programmable time frame.
“What’s also
becoming very popular is automated maintenance,” Mangieri says.
“The calibration stations have evolved even more so they can be
networked so safety or plant managers or others can view all of the
instrumentation around the plant from the office, from home or
from anywhere around the world. We are the leader in the progression
of calibration and documentation on our docking stations. And we’ve
taken it a step further with wrapping services around the whole
monitoring and maintenance elements. If a customer doesn’t want to
do the maintenance or even to buy the equipment, we offer a four
year lease program in which we do all the maintenance, the sensor
and maintenance replacement, and any repairs.”
All of this, Mangieri continues, refers to hand held gas monitors.
The other side has to do with the fixed gas monitors, which also
serve as an employee protection device, but is more for facility
protection.
It can be used not only for protecting a plant from explosion, but
also for process monitoring.
A lot of losses in the manufacturing process may not represent a
hazard but can be a loss of money, so these devices can monitor that
aspect as well. These permanent mechanisms do the essentials,
such as sound alarms and shut down valves, but are not as far along
as the hand held devices. One reason, Mangieri says, is that once
they’re hardwired into the facility, upgrading by tearing them out
is extremely expensive, so they’re not as likely to keep up with the
latest innovations.
Walter Fournet, a sales associate for the Pittsburgh, PA based Mine
Safety Appliances Company (MSA), has been in the business for 25
years. He comments on the cost factor trends.
“The costs, not only of the basic product, but also the maintenance
and operations costs are dropping considerably,” he says. “This
includes labor costs. As an example, just two years ago someone
would have to sit with the meter to get it calibrated. The machine
will do that now. The computerization has also been a great benefit.
Now someone working in the field might not be looking at the meter,
but a controller can receive the signal that perhaps the gases are
starting to rise, and he can notify the worker to make the necessary
adjustments.”
The four “death” meters, which account for about 80 percent of sales
in the marketplace, are flammable gases, hydrogen sulfide, carbon
monoxide (CO), and oxygen loss, Fournet says. “All of them sound an
alarm, and have been around for many years.”
What has been changing for these four death units have been the
price, Fournet continues. Five years ago, the price would range from
$1500 to $3000. Now what would have been a $2000 unit can be
purchased for about $500. “A $3000 unit had a warranty of one year,
but now a $500 unit has a two year warranty, which might go to
three. You’re also starting to see two year warranties on the
consumables. In fact, we’re moving toward a $400 meter for all four
deaths, which can be thrown
away in two years so you can purchase a new one rather than maintain
the used one. A single gas meter for only one of the four deaths can
be purchased for $200 with a two year warranty.”
Commenting on the new technologies, Fournet says infrared will make
the electrochemical
sensors, which have been around since the 1940s, obsolete. “The
infrared is much more accurate and lasts much longer. We have it for
CO and flammable gases, but it’s generally cost prohibitive,
and we have to get the costs down.”
In terms of surface acoustic wave technology, “It’s here today and
has been on the market close to 10 years,” Fournet says. “We’re just
tapping its capabilities.
It can detect nerve gas. The cost is still high, about $12,000, but
the costs are lowering.”
The multiple gas thermo ionization detector also goes a step beyond
the four death unit, spotting nerve gas, radiation, volatile organic
compounds and other industrial toxics, Fournet says. The cellular
radio communication signal emerged after September 11th, and is just
now gaining acceptance, with various grant funding and chemical
companies incorporating them.
The Chesapeake, VA-based Air Systems International, Inc., started
out in a garage some 20 years ago, and focuses on meeting the 1910.134 requirement for workers wearing respirators, whether it
is for pressure on demand, as with firefighters, or a more
constant flow. “Our systems exceed the requirements of both the U.S.
and Canadian standards,” says Marketing Manager, Maria Rowland.
She explains that the compressed air going into the
respirator can be contaminated by carbon monoxide,
carbon dioxide, hydrocarbons, particulates, organic vapors or other
impurities. The “breather box” detects these
contaminants in order to maintain grade-D quality air required by OSHA.
"We recommend that system air quality should be
tested for but not limited to the following Grade-D air components:
CO, oxygen, carbon dioxide, moisture content, hydrocarbons, and
total
particulates prior to putting the filtration system into place.
Typically the compressed air is carried by the
workers, but not necessarily,” Rowland says. For instance air may be
coming from the plant or on the outside going down into a sewer
where men are working.
Basically, says Mangieri, the dangers from gas
result either from explosion, exposure, or the loss of oxygen which
is taken over by other gases. When asked whether these devices have
served to actually and significantly improve worker safety,
Mangieri’s response is, “Absolutely.”