|
|
|
First
Response |
AIHA Names Henshaw Winner of Smyth Award
The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) has presented the
2006 Henry F. Smyth Jr. Award to John L. Henshaw, CIH, former
secretary of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
The award was presented at the 2006 Professional Conference on
Industrial Hygiene (PCIH) held Sept. 16–19 in San Jose, CA by AIHA’s
Academy of Industrial Hygiene.
“It is an honor to present this award to Mr. Henshaw on behalf of
the Academy,” said Daniel E. Agopsowicz, CIH, Academy president.
“His dedication to promoting the industrial hygiene profession
through his vision and achievements has earned great respect from
his peers.”
As recipient of the award, Henshaw delivered the Henry F. Smyth Jr.
Memorial Lecture at PCIH. His remarks were entitled “Historical
Review–Employer Responsibility.”
“Society and laws have tried to hold the employer accountable for
workplace health and safety for centuries, but still we have
disease, death, and injury from working,” said Henshaw. “This is
unacceptable, and I see a wide variety of opportunities for our
profession to bring this message
home by looking beyond our traditional roles. I look forward to
discussing my thoughts with PCIH attendees and challenging our
profession in reaching greater results in workplace health and
safety.”
Henshaw, who is president of Henshaw and Associates Inc., has had a
long and distinguished career in industrial hygiene. He received his
bachelor’s degree in biology from the Appalachian State University
in Boone, North Carolina, followed by a master’s degree in public
health (industrial
hygiene /environmental health administration) from the University of
Michigan School of Public Health.
Named by President George W. Bush as assistant secretary of labor
for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in
2001, Henshaw was confirmed by the Senate on August 2001
and served until December 2004.
Henry F. Smyth Jr. was a dedicated teacher and researcher who
recognized the need for sharing ideas and communicating his
achievements with his students and his peers through publications
and presentations. Smyth became involved in projects that enhanced
the profession, and he
provided necessary leadership to ensure the success of those
projects.
British Health and Safety Exec: Get a Life
The Health and Safety Commission (HSC) in the United Kingdom is
urging people to focus on real risks — those that cause real harm
and suffering — and to stop concentrating on trivial risks,
launching a set of key principles and practical actions it believes
sensible risk management
should, and should not, be about.
The principles can be found at
www.hse.gov.uk/risk.
Launching the principles at a children’s sailing centre in north
London, Bill Callaghan, Chair of the HSC, said: “I’m sick and tired
of hearing that ‘health and safety’ is stopping people from doing
worthwhile and enjoyable things when at the same time others are
suffering real harm and even death as a result of mismanagement at
work.
“Some of the ‘health and safety’ stories are just myths. There are
also some instances where health and safety is used as an excuse to
justify unpopular decisions such as closing facilities. But behind
many of the stories, there is at least a grain of truth — someone
really has made a stupid decision.
We’re determined to tackle all three. My message is that if you’re using
health and safety to stop everyday activities — get a life and let
others get on with theirs.”
Lending support to the principles, author and adventurer Ben Fogle
said, “Children encounter risk everyday and it’s important that
through activities they learn how to enjoy themselves but also stay
safe. I probably take more risks than most — and I wouldn’t want my
life to be any other way. No one wants a world where children, in
fact anyone, are wrapped in cotton wool, prevented from taking any
risks and scared of endeavor. That’s why I’m supporting HSE’s launch
and am happy to endorse these principles.”
Sensible risk management IS about:
* Ensuring that workers and the public are properly protected;
* Providing overall benefit to society by balancing benefits and
risks, with a focus on reducing real risks - both those which arise
more often and those with serious consequences;
* Enabling innovation and learning, not stifling them;
* Ensuring that those who create risks manage them responsibly and
understand that failure to manage real risks responsibly is likely
to lead to robust action; and
* Enabling individuals to understand that as well as the right to
protection, they also have to exercise responsibility.
Sensible risk management IS NOT about:
* Creating a totally risk free society;
* Generating useless paperwork mountains;
* Scaring people by exaggerating or publicizing trivial risks;
* Stopping important recreational and learning activities for
individuals where the risks are managed; and
* Reducing protection of people from risks that cause real harm and
suffering.
Commenting on the principles Jonathan Rees, HSE Deputy Chief
Executive, said:
“We want to cut red tape and make a real difference in people’s
lives. These principles
build on all of this and will hopefully drum home the message that
health and safety is not about long forms, back-covering, or
stifling initiative. It’s about recognizing real risks, tackling
them in a balanced way and watching out for each other. It’s about
keeping people safe - not stopping their lives.”
ASSE’s Goldman Begins Term as Head of Training Association
The American Society of Safety Engineers’ (ASSE) Manager of
Education and Program Development, Trudy Goldman, ARM, begins her
term this month as president of the International Association for
Continuing Education and Training (IACET). She has been an IACET
board member since 2000.
Goldman has a broad management background with concentration in the
areas of association management and health care risk management. She
previously served as risk manager for the University of Illinois at
Chicago and as executive director of the American Society for
Healthcare Risk Management (ASHRM). She received an Associate in
Risk Management (ARM) designation
from the Insurance Institute of America.
A past-president of the Healthcare Risk Management Society of
Metropolitan Chicago, Goldman was awarded the designation of Fellow
from ASHRM.
Goldman received her B.S. in Sociology and Psychology from the
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Created by a national task force in 1968, IACET is a non-profit
association dedicated to quality continuing education and training
programs. The association’s training criteria is recognized
worldwide as the universal standard for continuing education.
IACET’s mission is to promote and enhance quality in continuing
education and training through research, education and standard
setting. IACET certification is the standard learners seek for
quality continuing education and training and its criteria and
guidelines are the core of thousands of educational programs
worldwide.
ASSE is an authorized provider of continuing education, approved by
IACET.
The authorized provider status recognizes that ASSE can award
Continuing Education Units (CEUs) to attendees for training
completed at ASSE seminars, workshops and symposia at the national,
regional and chapter levels. Upcoming ASSE professional development
events from Goldman’s
department include the Nov. 16-17 Solutions in Safety Through
Technology Symposium in Scottsdale, AZ and the January 21-27, 2007
SeminarFest in Las Vegas featuring 45 seminars.
NSF Grants $12M to Study Nanotech’s Health & Safety Impact
The National Science Foundation has extended funding for Rice
University’s Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology
with a five-year renewal worth $12 million.The renewal ensures
CBEN programs will continue through 2011. CBEN was the first
academic research center in the world dedicated to studying the
interaction between nanomaterials and living organisms and
ecosystems.
It was founded with a five-year grant in 2001 and was eligible for a
onetime five-year extension.
“In its first five years, CBEN helped produce groundbreaking
research in nanomedicine, nanobiotechnology, nanotoxicology and
nanoscale methods for environmental remediation,” said CBEN Director
Vicki Colvin, professor of chemistry. “CBEN has played an active
role in informing the public, lawmakers and industry about potential
unintended environmental consequences of nanotechnology. With this
new funding, we are looking forward to making even more significant
strides.”
Colvin stressed that CBEN’s success has extended well beyond the
laboratory.
“Our educational programs for K-12 science teachers and their
students have exposed thousands of young people to the exciting
frontiers of nanoscale science,” she said. “In addition, we have
helped encourage companies to move nanotechnology from the
laboratory to the marketplace through a varied set of collaborations
with diverse groups like the Rice Alliance for Technology and
Entrepreneurship and the International Council on Nanotechnology
(ICON).”
CBEN was among the first six Nanoscale Science and Engineering
Centers (NSECs) funded by NSF following the creation of the National
Nanotechnology Initiative in 2000. NSF currently funds 16 NSECs.
“In 2000, nanotechnology research was focused on uncovering new
phenomena, and the question was, ‘When would we have applications in
various fields?’” said Mihail C. Roco, NSF’s senior adviser
for nanotechnology. “Then, CBEN was created as the first center on
health and environmental implications funded by NSF under NNI.
The creation of the center has symbolic meaning. From the challenge
of building the first nanostructures, we have moved into research on
societal hopes and concerns, and this in
the first year of the national initiative.
Now, after five years, the center not only has become a reference
resource at the national and international levels, but it also
defines the field itself, and how science, engineering and society
converge.”
CBEN’s research focus is on the so-called “wet-dry” interface
between biology and materials science. For example, the machinery of
life inside every living cell exists in a water based environment.
Nanomaterials, on the other hand, are often either insoluble or
unable to function efficiently in
solution. CBEN’s research aims to understand how nanomaterials
function in water-based environments such as living organisms and
ecosystems.
The International Council on Nanotechnology (ICON), a
multi-stakeholder initiative that grew out of
CBEN-led activities, is addressing the potential environmental and
health risks of nanotechnology.
ICON last year unveiled a nanomaterial-specific Environmental,
Health and Safety Database as a free public service.
EPA Releases New Guide on Mechanics’ Exposure to Asbestos
The Environmental Protection Agency is updating its guidance to
protect the health of auto mechanics with the release of a draft
brochure entitled, “Current Best Practices for Preventing Asbestos
Exposure
Among Brake and Clutch Repair Workers.”
The brochure contains information for both automotive professionals
and home mechanics. EPA is providing the public 60 days to comment
on the brochure.
The brochure includes work practices that may be used to avoid
asbestos exposure. It also summarizes existing Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA) regulatory requirements for
professional automotive mechanics. When finalized, the brochure will
supersede the existing Guidance for Preventing Asbestos Disease
Among Auto Mechanics, known as the “Gold Book.”
Asbestos is the common name given to a number of naturally occurring
mineral fibers that have been used in manufactured goods due to
their high tensile strength, resistance to heat, and chemical
stability.
Because of these properties, asbestos fibers have been used in a
number of products, including automobile clutch and brake parts.
Exposure to asbestos is potentially harmful to human health if
microscopic asbestos fibers, released into the air when asbestos is
disturbed or in poor condition, are inhaled into the lungs. Asbestos
exposure has been associated with a number of serious health
problems and diseases, including asbestosis, lung cancer, and
mesothelioma.
OSHA Accepting Comments on HazCom, Global Harmonization
OSHA has announced that it will publish an Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, seeking public comment on the implementation of
the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling
of Chemicals (GHS).
The notice appeared in the Federal Register on Sept. 12, 2006.
Adoption of the GHS by OSHA will require OSHA to propose changes to
the Agency’s Hazard Communication Standard (HCS).
The GHS is a system for standardizing and harmonizing the
classification and labeling of chemicals by providing a
comprehensive approach to defining the health and physical hazards
of chemicals, creating classification processes, and communicating
hazard information through uniform labels and safety data sheets.
“GHS is expected to bring more consistency and clarity, both from a
national and international perspective, to hazardous chemical
regulations in the workplace,” said OSHA Administrator Edwin G.
Foulke, Jr. “The diverse and sometimes conflicting national and
international requirements can
create confusion among employers who seek to use hazard information
to effectively protect their employees. One of the many benefits of
adopting GHS is that it would provide a consistent format for labels
and safety data sheets, making the information easier to comprehend
and access when making hazard assessments.”
To help those who are not familiar with the approach in the GHS,
OSHA has prepared a guidance document that summarizes the GHS
requirements.
The GHS has been adopted by the United Nations with a goal of broad
international adoption of the GHS by 2008. The adoption of the GHS
will facilitate international trade by increasing the consistency
between the laws in different countries that currently require
different information be provided to employers and employees about
chemicals during their production, transportation, use, and disposal
based on jurisdiction.
Written comments (in triplicate) must be submitted not later than
Nov. 13, 2006, to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. H-022K, Room
N2625, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, D.C. Electronic comments may be submitted to:
http://ecomments.osha.gov/. |
|
|