|
Reducing
Physical Damage
Mitigating Flood and Storm Water Runoff
Protecting a facility
from the
negative effects of flooding is not always as simple as merely locating
it outside known flood zones; inappropriate site layout and building
design can create a storm water runoff flood exposure anywhere.
Flooding can be caused by bodies of water (rivers,
streams, oceans, bays, lakes, canals, etc.) overflowing their normal
boundaries, or as the result of storm water runoff accumulating in
normally dry areas.
Off-site flooding can block access routes to and from
the site, as well as interrupt vital utilities. If a facility is located
within a known flood zone, the challenge of managing the flood risk is
greatly increased. The goals, according to FM Global’s Property Loss
Prevention Data Sheet on Storm Water Runoff and Terrain Management, then
become to ensure that:
(1) Operations can continue without interruption,
and (2) The facility suffers the least possible amount of physical
damage.
These goals can be achieved by developing a
flood-mitigation strategy throughout the facility that address overall
layout, electrical and mechanical systems, and vital utilities, and
applying it during all phases of the site’s lifespan, including design
and construction.
While instituting the flood-mitigation strategy is most
effective during the design and construction phases, practical
mitigation solutions included in FM’s data sheet can be very effective
for existing locations.
Site Selection
Proper site selection is the best
solution for avoiding the effects of flooding. Selecting the correct
site is far less difficult than designing a facility located in a flood
zone to resist the effects of flooding. Select a location where the
entire site and
all access
routes (highway, marine, railroad, etc.) are outside 500-year flood
zones (by both elevation and footprint). Verify flood studies for the
selected site are up-to-date by having a qualified hydrologist review
the study and recent flood data.
Select a building site that is at least 2 ft (0.6 m)
higher than the predicted 500-year flood elevation and at least 500 ft
(152 m) from direct wave impacts and or high flood-flow velocities.
Select a site that is not in an area protected by a levee or other
man-made flood control works.
Ensure electrical and communication services, drinking
and process water, wastewater treatment, steam supplies, etc. obtained
from off-site locations will remain unaffected during flooding in their
area. If this cannot be ensured, establish alternative sources
for backup.
Proper design of the facility’s storm water management
system is needed for all locations to ensure a flood exposure isn’t
created or flooding made worse by the layout, grading, storm-water
management system, etc. Ensure drainage systems are sized to handle a
100-year rainfall event without causing property damage. The duration of
the 100-year rainfall should be the storm that causes the most intense
runoff across the site. Both sub-surface routing (drainage piping) and
overland flow can be used to direct the runoff.
Ensure the facility’s storm-water management system uses
grading sufficient to route predicted rain-water and snow-melt runoff
away from buildings, outside storage, and equipment.
Ensure water runoff originating from offsite areas is
included in the facility’s site water management plan.
If on-site ponding or storm water routing is essential,
ensure it is arranged so water will not enter or come into contact with
buildings, outside storage, or equipment. Use customary drainage design
features to limit soil erosion and avoid excessively high flow
velocities. Use grates, trash racks, curbs, etc. to protect the inlet to
all drains and storm-water drainage systems against debris blockage.
Do not use landscaping materials, such as wood chips,
pine needles, etc, that can be easily dislodged by rain water. They may
obstruct or clog drainage systems, catch basins, culverts, or overland
flow patterns. Do not locate buildings, outside storage, or fire
protection equipment within natural storm water drainage flow paths such
as small streams or swales.
Ensure walls, fences, and landscaping do not direct
water on to buildings, outside storage, or fire protection equipment.
Install backflow preventers equipped with manual shut-off valves on each
side of the backflow preventers on effluent-discharge lines that connect
to combined sewer systems (wastewater and storm-water runoff) and any
other areas that have a history of backups.
Additionally, provide a backflow preventer by-pass line
and normally closed shut-off valve to allow for maintenance. If it is
not possible to comply with these recommendations, the risk of flooding
may be greatly reduced by building up land levels so they are 2 ft (0.6
m) higher than the predicted 500-year flood elevation. If this can-not
be avoided, provide erosion protection designed by a qualified engineer.
Design fill material to be stable when exposed to flood
action, including rapid rise and drawdown, prolonged inundation, scour,
and erosion.
Ensure the facility and grounds are designed by a
qualified registered civil or structural engineer with previous
experience in flood-related loading and geotechnical conditions.
Ensure the geotechnical properties used for the
foundation design (e.g., bearing and frictional resistance, active and
passive pressure, and settlement) are based on diminished structural
capacities that are associated with flood level and floodwater action.
Elevating Individual Buildings and
Key Equipment
If it is not possible to comply with
the above, the risk of flooding to specific buildings and equipment may
be greatly reduced by building them 2 ft (0.6 m) higher than the
predicted 500-year flood elevation. Design buildings, outside storage
areas and equipment (whether owned by the facility or a utility company)
to be at least 2 ft (0.6 m) above the 500-year flood level, by using
raised foundations or elevated structures.
Design foundations, buildings, and
outdoor structures to withstand the predicted 500-year flood elevation
plus 2 ft (0.6 m), and to resist erosion from high water-velocity. Do
not build foundations in areas subject to high or moderate velocity
flows. If this cannot be avoided, provide erosion protection designed by
a qualified engineer. Do not narrow, re-route, or change the on-site
watercourse.
Design and build structures to
adequately resist all flood-related loads and conditions, including
hydrostatic loads, hydrodynamic loads, breaking wave action, debris
impact, ice floes, ice and debris jams, rapid rise and drawdown of
floodwaters, prolonged inundation, soil liquefaction, soil consolidation
and subsistence, sediment deposition, mudslides, and wave-induced and
flood-related erosion and scour.
Consider long-term erosion over the
design life of the structure when determining the effects of flooding on
building and foundation design. Ensure design considerations also
account for other applicable loads (e.g., gravity and wind) that will
act on the structure concurrently with the flood. Consider all
appropriate load combinations when analyzing flood loads for actions,
including overturning, sliding, undermining (erosion and scour), and
uplift (buoyant forces).
Use load combinations, load factors,
and resistance factors as specified in the governing model codes and
standards. Where local codes do not specify load combinations with flood
loads, use load combinations from the most recent editions of ASCE 7 or
the International Building Code (IBC). However, in no case use flood
load factors of less than 1.3 in strength design or 1.0 in allowable
stress design.
Retain a qualified registered
civil/structural engineer with previous experience in flood-related
loading and flood-related geotechnical conditions to design buildings,
structures, and protective works (e.g., flood walls, retaining walls,
bulkheads, levees, dams, channels, and diversions).
FSM
|
|
|