Facility Safety Management
OTI Communications
Our Mission  Contact Us  Subscribe Media Kit  Previous Issues  Web Links 
FSM Lynx

Flammable Cabinet

American Trainco

National Safety Council

ERT



Lewellyn

Follow Us
Join Us on Facebook Join us on Twitter

Guide for Evaluating Cleanroom Disinfectants
New Standard Says Understanding of Microbiology Essential

 When it comes to a successful cleanroom disinfection program, the proper selection of disinfecting agents combined with in-house qualification testing is key.

According to the ASTM E2614-08, “Standard Guide for Evaluation of Cleanroom Disinfectants,” an understanding of microbiology and microbiological techniques is essential.

Knowledge in the following areas is recommended: microorganisms, antimicrobial products, and the chemistry of disinfection, activity of disinfectants on cells, application procedures, cleanroom surfaces, and environmental conditions within a cleanroom.

Though the theoretical basis for disinfectant activity is not addressed in ASTM E2614-08, an understanding of the effect of disinfectant concentration on microbial reduction and kinetics is desirable in determining the use-dilution of different disinfectants and in using dilution to neutralize a disinfectant for efficacy testing.

Although the information in the guide is written for the cleanroom environment, many of the principles are applicable to

manufacturing-processing environments outside of the cleanroom.

Requirements for aseptic processing areas include readily cleanable floors, walls, and ceilings that have smooth, non-porous surfaces; particulate, temperature, and humidity controls; and cleaning and disinfecting procedures to produce and maintain aseptic conditions. These conditions combined with careful and thorough evaluation of the chemical agents used for the cleaning and disinfection program should lead to achieving the specified cleanliness standards and control of microbial contamination of products. In recent years, the use of disinfectants in pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device facilities, and associated controlled environments has been the subject of scrutiny by regulatory agencies.

Manufacturers are being held to a high

standard when it comes to product sterility, and regulatory agencies are increasingly asking for validation data to support sanitization and disinfection procedures. Regulatory authorities now expect evidence of the efficacy of disinfection agents against environmental isolates.

The FDA Guideline for Aseptic Processing states, “the suitability, efficacy, and limitations of disinfecting agents and procedures should be assessed. The effectiveness of these disinfectants and procedures should be measured by their ability to ensure that potential contaminants are adequately removed from surfaces.”

Basic knowledge regarding the effectiveness of different chemical agents against vegetative bacteria, fungi, and spores will aid in selecting chemical agents.

A good understanding of test methods used to assess disinfectant effectiveness also is important. Most methods are adaptable allowing the user to customize the methods to their specific requirements.

Selection Procedure

In pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and associated industries, the selection of one sanitizer, one or two disinfectants, and one sporicide is typical. More than one type of chemical agent is needed to obtain the proper balance of effective microbial control and minimal surface damage because products vary in spectrum of activity and formulation. Currently, most facilities select one or two disinfecting agents to use on a routine basis and supplement with a sporicide, which is used on a less frequent routine basis to address spores that may not be destroyed by the routine disinfectant.

More than one type of chemical agent is needed to ob­tain the proper balance of effective mi­crobial control and minimal surface damage because products vary in spec­trum of activity and formulation. Cur­rently, most facilities select one or two disinfecting agents to use on a routine ba­sis and supplement with a sporicide, which is used on a less frequent routine basis to address spores that may not be destroyed by the routine disinfectant.

All three product types should be evalu­ated for effectiveness with appropriate test methods. Typical agents used in cleanrooms are:

Sanitizers: 70 percent v/v Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA); 70 percent v/v Ethanol.

Disinfectants: Phenols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Hydrogen Peroxide, 3 percent Sodium; Hypochlorite < 0.10 percent 70 percent v/v; Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) 70 percent v/v Ethanol.

Sporicides: Sodium Hypochlorite > 0.3 percent; Hydrogen Peroxide > 6 percent; Peracetic Acid Chlorine; Dioxide Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide.

Sanitizers play a role in a cleanroom disinfection program. Isopropyl alcohol has good broad-spectrum efficacy, but in the manner which it is used routinely, minimal product contact time and flammability are of concern. Classifying 70 percent IPA as a decontamination or residue control agent is more appropriate, since it is often used dur­ing cleaning operations, as a sanitizer dur­ing manufacturing, and for removal of residues left from other antimicrobial agents.

It is important to choose a disinfectant that incorporates a surfactant in its formu­lation to help clean surfaces. Occasionally,

the choice will be made to rotate two dif­ferent disinfectants. These agents are de­signed for frequent use.

Sporicidal formulations typically contain highly reactive chemicals (for example, sodium hypochlorite or oxidizers) and may cause damage to surfaces, even stainless steel, if used too frequently. However, they are a necessity in the cleanroom since rou­tine disinfectants are not effective against bacterial endospores or resistant mold spores such as Aspergillus niger.

Typically, they are not used on a daily basis to avoid damage to substrates and re­duce the potential for irritation to cleaning personnel.

Critical Factors in Selecting Chemical Agents

One of the first steps in selection of a chemical agent is to collect all pertinent and available information from the potential supplier. This would include EPA registra­tion, technical data sheets, MSDS, recom­mended directions for use as well as data on substrate compatibility, stability, and mi­crobiocidal efficacy performed according to acceptable standards.

Cleanroom Bioburden: A review of environmental monitoring data is necessary to determine the number and types of mi­croorganisms to be controlled. Not all chemical agents are effective against all microorganisms and not all are sporicidal. Knowing the types of microbial flora in the area to be disinfected aids in selecting an appropriate disinfectant with the desired spectrum of activity. From this informa­tion, a facility can determine what efficacy is needed and identify potential product candidates.

Contact Time: For a disinfectant to be effective, a surface must remain wet for a defined period of time. The contact time may vary depending on the target microbial contamination, air temperature, as well as the type of surface being treated.

Preparation: Products can be purchased in concentrate form or a ready-to-use form. If a concentrated product is selected, dilu­tion will be necessary. The accuracy of preparation of a use-dilution is critical for optimal performance.

Regulatory standards require that disin fectants used in cleanrooms are sterile; therefore it may be necessary to purchase the agent sterile or sterilize it in-house. The kind of water available for dilution is also important. Water hardness or softness can interfere with the action of some disinfec­tants. It is recommended that purified water or better be used to dilute the concentrate.

Safety and Toxicity: The product MSDS should be reviewed to determine special storage and handling requirements and to identify any potential hazards to per­sonnel working with the agent. Appropriate regulations should be reviewed regarding disposal.

Compatibility: Some disinfectants are incompatible with others and can cause problematic residues. Performance of dis­infectants can be decreased if they are in­compatible with cleaning agents used in the area. Additionally, compatibility with surface types in the cleanroom should be evaluated. FSM

Source: ASTM E2614-08, Standard Guide for Evaluation of Cleanroom Disin­fectants. To download the full standard, go to www.astm.org/Standards/E2614.htm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haws

Dustless Technologies

Frommelt

Kirk Key

ProAct Safety

 

© 2010 Facility Safety Management - All Rights Reserved - Get Adobe Reader