
Improved Efficiencies,
IAQ and Productivity
Evaluating the Value of ‘Green’ Design to Occupational Health & Safety
(The First of Two Parts)
B
Y
NEIL
SILINS
‘Green’ technologies, protection of
the environment and sustainable business
practices are becoming more and
more a way of life and doing business.
We keep hearing about ‘green this’ and
‘sustainable that,’ but the question, at least
for some safety practitioners, is how does
green affect the practice of safety and
health?
We, as a society, have acknowledged that
there is an environmental component to
health and safety, although the component is
not always obvious and the connection
seems, at times, ephemeral. Perhaps, it’s
time to examine green building programs
and identify areas where occupational health
and safety (OH&S) are impacted, while exploring
its potential value to OH&S.
Some of the issues faced by environmental
professionals and their associated sustainability
concerns have mirrored those of
the safety profession. These include communicating the value of design that eliminates
hazardous by-products and wastes
rather than being limited to disposal of those
by-products and wastes at the end of the
process (end-of-pipe).
For the safety profession, this can be read
as designing the workplace to eliminate
hazards rather than (or in addition to) writing
up a safety program to accommodate
these same hazards in the workplace and
the incidents that result from those hazards.
Both the environmental and safety fields
have been involved in conveying their value
to management by showing a healthy effect
on the bottom line, thereby financially justifying
the costs associated with compliance
and beyond.
Just as there are many ways that industry
is embracing the “green” label, there are
many approaches that we might examine to
explore the connection between OH&S and
green. One program currently being explored
uses the Chicago Waste to Profit Network
(WTPN) as a model. This business to-
business network facilitates the
transformation of one company’s waste, or
by-product, into an industrial input for another
company.
The process, known as by-product synergy,
turns one company’s waste streams
into a second company’s raw material.
By-product synergy creates a productive
revenue stream while reducing the environmental
impact of production. In the
process, it demonstrates the bottom-line
impact (positive) to both sides of the equation,
which is “win-win.”
In this example, a relatively simple
green concept results in net profit to both
companies. The WTPN provides a clear
connection between environmental practice
and the bottom line, but its impact on
occupational health and safety is yet to be
established.
The Built Environment
Another approach to protection of the environment
and sustainability pertains to the
built environment. Green, or sustainable,
building is the practice of creating and using
healthier and more resource-efficient models
of construction, renovation, operation,
maintenance and demolition.
According to the US EPA, green building
concepts include energy efficiency, renewable
energy, water efficiency,
environmentally preferable building materials,
waste and toxics reduction, indoor air
quality and sustainable development.
Properly conceived and executed, green
building is a design and construction collaboration
and cooperation process that results
in structures that are protective of the
environment and occupant health.
Before selecting one green building program
as a paradigm of sustainable design, it
may be helpful to examine some others.
There are several green building guidelines
in existence. Various states and municipalities
have written green building programs.
These include the Wisconsin Green Built
Home, Florida Green Home Designation, City of Scottsdale Green Building Program,
New Mexico Building America Partnership,
the City of Chicago Green Homes program
and others. These programs are, by-and large,
focused on residential structures and
are limited in application to their respective
jurisdictions.
Another program, ENERGY STAR, is
a joint program of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and the U.S. Department
of Energy. ENERGY STAR
sets standards for energy efficient products
and practices including appliances
and building components.
LEED Protocols
The US Green Building Council (USGBC)
has developed consensus protocols
for green building design, construction and
day-to-day operations. These protocols,
known collectively as Leadership in Energy
and Environmental Design, or LEED,
are a third party certification program and
have become nationally accepted benchmarks
for the design, construction and operation
of high performance green
buildings.
There are LEED certification programs
for new construction (LEED NC), existing
buildings’ ongoing operations and maintenance
activities (LEED EBOM), commercial
interiors (LEED CI) and other
categories of projects ranging from single-
family residential structures to neighborhoods
and communities. Each rating
system includes prerequisites that must be
met for certification, and credits. LEED
certification is available in four progressive
levels: Certified, Silver, Gold and
Platinum. Credit totals determine which
certification status is awarded to the project.
Note that LEED is being continually
evaluated and improved by USGBC and
the various LEED committees.
The process of gaining LEED certification
for a building is a cooperative effort
that, ideally, begins with a charette, a meeting
of all of the involved parties – client
(owner), architects, engineers, general contractor,
subcontractors, vendors and the
eventual facility management.
Because of the frequently complex interactions
between building systems, determining
which LEED credits to pursue is often the result of weighing each credit,
to evaluate the synergies and tradeoffs inherent
in each. For example, deciding on
permeable parking surfaces to reduce
storm water runoff may have an impact on
subsequent landscaping and snow removal
activities.
Additionally, calculations evaluating
cost and payback period will have an influence
on which credits are pursued for
a particular project. The charette and
subsequent meetings as envisioned in the
certification process represent a substantial
change from the typical construction
and building management
processes.
In the typical construction process the
architect delivers the plans to the general
contractor, who then finds subcontractors
and vendors who can meet the
architect’s design and specifications.
The General Contractor and subcontractors
are then responsible for worker
safety on the project.
In this process there is little formal
chance for dialog. In the LEED-envisioned
process, dialog is a necessary
component. Sometimes the resulting design
components challenge existing code
requirements, which can then be addressed
by code officials or the authority
having jurisdiction. The LEED
certification process can offer an unprecedented
opportunity for the involvement
of all stakeholders in building
design and operation.
LEED Established
The following serves to establish the bona
fides of the LEED program. Since 2000, the
City of Seattle has used the US Green
Building Council’s LEED Rating System
to evaluate City projects and sets a policy
goal of Silver Level performance for City funded
projects with over 5,000 square feet
of occupied space.
A Cook County, Illinois ordinance
dated 2001 requires all newly constructed
county facilities to be built to the LEED
silver standard of certification. The
Chicago Center for Green Technology, a
project of the City of Chicago, IL is the
first LEED Platinum public building.
And, since FY 2003 all new General Services
Administration (GSA) building projects
have been required to meet criteria
for basic LEED certification.
Currently, several additional municipalities
are considering requiring LEED certification for new construction within their jurisdictions,
and more are anticipated to be
added to the list.
The primary focus of the LEED program
has been the registration and certification of
building projects, revolving around the reduction
of energy usage and protection of
the environment. LEED prerequisites and
credits extend beyond the building shell,
however, and include neighborhood density and transportation to the building. More significant
for this discussion, however, a significant
number of prerequisites and credits
relate directly or indirectly to occupant comfort
and health. FSM
Neil Silins
is a LEED accredited professional
and president of EMS Environmental,
Inc. Next month's issue will feature how
the LEED categories are related to worker
health and safety.