
Noise Level
Are My STS’s Recordable and Where Did Hearing Loss Occur?
THOMAS H. CAMERON, PH.D., CCC-A, CPS/A
Although we often take it for
granted, hearing is one of our
most important senses. During infancy
and childhood, hearing is vital
for the normal development of
speech and language.
Hearing remains equally important
throughout life as it enables us to communicate
with friends and colleagues,
and allows us to stay connected to and
be aware of our environment.
The ear is a remarkable structure, capable
of detecting sounds in a wide
range of frequencies and intensities.
Illness, disease, and heredity can affect
our ability to hear, however, as can aging
and exposure to loud noise.
The fact that hearing can be damaged
by noise is the reason OSHA requires
us to monitor workplace noise levels, establish hearing conservation programs
and perform annual hearing testing on
our employees. These requirements are
detailed in the OSHA noise regulation,
29 CFR 1910.95.
According to the OSHA noise regulation,
overall hearing thresholds must
be determined for each ear at, or shortly
after the time of hire, and annually
thereafter. Results of each annual test
are compared to the employee’s baseline
test to see if a Standard Threshold
Shift (STS) has occurred. The regulation
defines an STS as “a change in
hearing threshold relative to the baseline
audiogram of an average of 10 dB
or more at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz in
either ear.”
Chances are that one or two of your
employees will show an STS following their annual hearing tests. Since OSHA
considers most STS’s to be work-related
and recordable on the OSHA 300
Log unless determined otherwise by an
audiologist or a physician, you may, if
you wish, simply record these STS’s on
the OSHA Log. However, if you wish
to minimize your number of OSHA Log
entries, a little background regarding
the auditory mechanism, the testing
process, and the purpose of the hearing
conservation program may be helpful.
Conductive vs.
Sensorineual Hearing Loss
As a sound wave travels from its
source, it enters the listener’s outer ear,
passes though the middle ear, and then
enters the inner ear before traveling
along the auditory nerve to the brain.
Blockage or damage located anywhere
along this auditory pathway can cause
some degree of hearing loss. Problems
located in the outer or middle ear may
result in conductive hearing loss while
damage to the inner ear or the auditory
nerve results in sensorineural loss.
Conductive hearing loss, caused by
problems in the outer ear such as impacted
cerumen (ear wax), or in the
middle ear, such as fluid accumulation
or otosclerosis, can typically be treated
successfully either medically or surgically.
Sensorineural hearing loss, on
the other hand, is usually a result of
damage to the tiny sensory hair cells of
the inner ear and can not be treated, although
hearing aids may often be of
help. Two common causes of sensorineural
hearing loss are aging and
noise exposure.
A diagnostic evaluation by an audiologist
will include pure tone testing by
both air conduction and bone conduction.
This will determine not only an
individual’s overall hearing level, but
will also reveal whether the hearing
loss is conductive, sensorineural, or
mixed (that is having both conductive
and sensorineural components). Treatment
options are then based upon these
findings.
Hearing conservationists, however,
are limited by the OSHA noise regulation to pure tone air conduction testing
only. This testing assesses the integrity
of the entire auditory system, but can
not tell us whether a hearing loss is
conductive, sensorineural, or mixed.
Clearly, OSHA mandated hearing tests
are not meant to be diagnostic, but are
intended to serve as safety measures,
alerting us to the possibility that employee
hearing is being affected by exposure
to workplace noise.
Determining Recordability
and Work Relation
An STS, therefore, tells us that employee’s
hearing has worsened compared
to baseline test results, but does
not tell us why it has worsened. Since
OSHA considers most STS’s to be
work-related unless determined otherwise
by an appropriate professional,
you may simply record all the STS’s on
the OSHA 300 Log.
Did you know, however, that you can
have an audiologist or a physician make
a determination regarding the work-relatedness
of your STS’s? You may, of
course, utilize the services of local audiologists
or physicians, but an excellent
first choice would be the
audiologist or medical doctor who provides
professional oversight of your
hearing conservation program.
The determination process is straightforward.
You will most likely be asked
to submit a questionnaire indicating the
employee’s 8-hour TWA (timeweighted
average) noise exposure and
the NRR (noise reduction rating) of his
or her hearing protection. Earplug or
earmuff NRR’s are determined by the
manufacturer and can be found on the product packaging material.
Time weighted average noise exposure
is best measured by personal
dosimetry, although a sound level meter
can be used. If the employee works an
extended shift, it will be important to
provide values normalized to an 8-hour
shift as OSHA requires that this information
be furnished to the audiogram
reviewer.
You will also be asked to provide information
about non-work noise exposure
and any health conditions that may
possibly be affecting hearing.
The reviewing professional will
check to see if the hearing protection
worn by the employee is adequate for
the reported noise exposure.
The employee’s audiometric history
will also be examined in conjunction
with information you have provided in
the questionnaire.
Certain audiometric configurations
may suggest conductive hearing loss
and, especially in combination with information
suggesting a current cold or a
history of outer or middle ear problems, may be determined “not work-related.”
Most cases, however, are not so
straightforward. More often, it is the
additional information provided in the
questionnaire regarding health conditions
or non-work noise exposure that
is critical.
Many audiometric configurations
will show high frequency hearing
losses, which suggest the sensorineural
losses caused by both noise and aging.
Of help in distinguishing these two
common causes of sensorineural loss is
the employee’s pure tone threshold at
8000 Hz.
OSHA does not require testing at this
frequency, but it is strongly recommended
that you include it in your testing
program. While both noise and age
result in high frequency hearing losses,
the pure tone configurations typically
differ in that noise induced hearing loss
will often show an improvement at
8000 Hz while age-related hearing loss
will not.
If the pure tone configuration suggests
noise-induced hearing loss, is that loss due to workplace noise or recreational
noise, or a combination of both?
What about power tools or firearm use?
What about family history of hearing
loss? Is there a history of diabetes?
Without additional information, the reviewer
may be unable to make a determination
as to whether or not the STS
is work-related.
Remember that OSHA considers
most STS’s to be work-related. OSHA
does give you the option, however, of
having an audiologist or a physician
review each of your STS’s for workrelatedness.
While such review does not guarantee
that a given STS will be determined
“not work-related,” it will almost certainly
reduce the overall number of
cases you need to record on the OSHA
300 Log. FSM
Thomas H. Cameron, Ph.D., CCCA,
CPS/A, is supervising audiologist
with The EI Group, Inc., an environmental,
health and safety solutions
provider. He can be reached at
www.ei1.com.