FSM Lynx

Flammable Cabinet

American Trainco

National Safety Council

ERT



Lewellyn

Follow Us
Join Us on Facebook Join us on Twitter

Haws

Dustless Technologies

Frommelt

Kirk Key

ProAct Safety

Return to News
Spectral Lighting
Improve Energy Efficiency with High Performance CCT Lamp

Can the color of lighting affect the energy efficiency of lighting systems? According to the Department of Energy, the answer is yes.

When the spectral properties of ambient lighting are shifted to be more like the color of daylight (more white), our eyes respond the same as if lighting levels were increased — the pupils of our eyes get smaller, spaces seem brighter, and we see things more clearly.

The DOE’s solid-state lighting portfolio activities target improvements in the efficiency, performance, lifetime, and quality of light from both organic and inorganic light emitting diodes. Solid-state lighting systems have the potential to more than double the efficiency of today’s systems, and these research and development efforts represent an essential component of meeting the DOE's Building Technologies Program’s energy efficiency goals.

Still, a mix of lighting solutions will be needed to meet our nation’s near-term and long-term needs. Spectrally enhanced lighting is a simple strategy that uses existing products and technology to significantly reduce energy use in commercial buildings.

The Cost of Lighting

According to the Buildings Energy Data Book, energy consumption for all lighting in the United States is estimated to be about 18 percent of the total electricity generated in the country. More than half of the energy is consumed in the commercial sector, where lighting coincides with peak electrical demand and contributes to a building’s internal heat generation, increasing air-conditioning load.

The conversion of electricity into useful light is one of the least efficient energy conversion processes in buildings today. The DOE says advanced lighting technologies can significantly improve the energy efficiency of lighting and reduce building energy consumption and costs.

The concept behind SEL: A significant amount of energy can be saved by using lamps that have less light output, but higher correlated color temperature (CCT). Lamps with higher CCT appear brighter than those with lower CCT, so the actual light output of higher CCT lamps can be decreased, while maintaining equivalent perceived brightness and visual acuity.

Thus, energy can be saved because the actual light output of the higher CCT lamps can be decreased, while maintaining equivalent perceived brightness and visual acuity relative to lower CCT lamps. Energy savings are achieved by using lower wattage lamps and/or lower ballast factor ballasts.

Unlike other energy efficiency strategies, SEL is not a technology — it’s a different way to quantify light that can be used with any type of lighting design to improve energy performance. Energy savings are achieved by using high performance and high CCT lamps coupled with efficient electronic ballasts.

The DOE says SEL is a market-ready, cost effective solution for quick energy savings. It is simple to implement, and can currently be employed in buildings as a cost effective way to get quick energy savings. It is non-proprietary, requires no fancy controls or gadgets, and the energy savings are significant. In addition, SEL is low risk, and DOE says there are no known negatives to installing this type of lighting in commercial buildings.

An evaluation of lighting retrofits at three office buildings in California in 2005 conducted by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for the DOE Building Technologies Program found energy savings are achieved via lower wattage lamps and/or lower ballast factor ballasts.

In the Spectrally-Enhanced Lighting Program: Implementation for Energy Savings demonstrations, existing fluorescent lamps, from 3000 to 4100 Kelvin, were replaced with lamps of 5000 Kelvin. Normal ballast factor ballasts (0.88) were replaced with new electronic ballasts with ballast factors ranging from 0.60 to 0.77.

The demonstrations were designed to decrease lighting power loads in the three buildings by 22 percent to 50 percent, depending on the existing installed lamps and ballasts. The buildings were a 57,000- square-foot office building located in Santa Rosa, Calif., in which 1,700 T12 lamps were replaced; an 119,000-square-foot office building located in Vallejo, in which 2,800 T8 lamps were replaced; and a 67,000- square-foot office building located in Oxnard, in which 2,300 T8 lamps were replaced.

The project designers hypothesized that this reduction in electrical loads could be achieved by the change to higher CCT lamps without decreasing occupant satisfaction with the lighting. During a six-month period, PNNL performed field measurements and occupant surveys before and after the lighting retrofits were completed. PNNL measured the following: overhead lighting electrical loads, light levels in the workspace, task lighting use, and occupant ratings of satisfaction with the lighting. The analysis compared pre-retrofit to post-retrofit conditions in these four areas.

Electrical loads (kW) and consumption (kWh) by the overhead lighting equipment were measured by installing data logger meters on the lighting circuits at the lighting control panel. Data were collected for at least two weeks under the pre-retrofit or baseline condition (in which existing lamps were replaced with identical new lamps and the fixtures were cleaned) and for at least two weeks following the retrofit with the new higher CCT lamps and new ballasts.

The logging meters were configured to record average overhead lighting loads (in kW) in five-minute intervals 24 hours per day during the monitoring periods. In addition, connected load measurements were taken on a sample of fixtures in each building during the baseline period and in the post-retrofit period.

Pre-retrofit and post-retrofit illuminance measurements were taken at representative spaces in each building before and after retrofit. The instrument used for all measurements was a combined photopic/scotopic meter. The human eye has two types of photoreceptor cells, known by their shape as “cones” and “rods.” The photopic luminous efficiency function describes the sensitivity of the cone-shaped photoreceptor cells to all the wavelengths in the visible spectrum. The rod-shaped photoreceptor cells have a different sensitivity curve, called the scotopic luminous efficiency function.

Standard light meters are calibrated to the photopic response. Use of a photopic/scotopic meter allowed for measurement of the scotopic illuminance levels and calculation of the scotopic to photopic (S/P) ratio. The S/P ratio provides an easily referenced indicator of relative blue content in the light source. Most light sources have S/P ratios ranging from 0.8 to 2.5, with the higher values containing more energy in the blue wavelengths of the visible spectrum.

Pre- and post-retrofit task lighting use was monitored to assess whether people compensated for the lower overhead light levels by using their task lights more frequently. In all three buildings, under-cabinet mounted task lighting fixtures of 15-40 watts were present. The frequency of task lighting use was monitored with portable data loggers installed in a sample of task lights in each building. Data were collected for about two weeks in both the pre- and postretrofit periods.

PNNL’s evaluation found that connected loads due to overhead lighting in the three buildings decreased by 20 percent to 46 percent following the retrofit. Horizontal photopic light levels decreased by 15 percent to 31 percent. Task lighting use did not change significantly, as indicated by metered use or in terms of occupants’ reported use. Finally, occupant ratings of satisfaction with the lighting did not change significantly following the retrofits in any of the three buildings. Appropriate lamps are available through many major lamp manufacturers and are generally no more expensive than traditional lamps. The predominant light source used in commercial applications is fluorescent lighting; the lamps and ballasts used dictate the efficiency of fluorescent lighting systems.

Using higher color temperature, fluorescent lighting and new high-efficiency ballasts can achieve energy savings of 20-40 percent compared to traditional fluorescent lighting systems, according to results of the DOE study, and can be achieved by simple lamp/ballast retrofits. FSM Source: “Spectrally Enhanced Lighting Program Implementation for Energy Savings: Field Evaluation,” prepared by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Building Technologies Program.

© 2010 Facility Safety Management - All Rights Reserved - Get Adobe Reader