FSM Lynx

Flammable Cabinet

American Trainco

National Safety Council

ERT



Lewellyn

Follow Us
Join Us on Facebook Join us on Twitter

Haws

Dustless Technologies

Frommelt

Kirk Key

ProAct Safety

Return to News
Control and Safeguarding
10 Aspects of Protecting Robotic System Operators

Generally used to perform unsafe, highly repetitive, and unpleasant tasks that may be hazardous to workers, robots have many different functions such as material handling, assembly, welding, machine tool load and unload functions, painting, spraying, and so forth.

Still, people can get hurt around them. Studies indicate that many robot accidents occur during non-routine operating conditions, such as programming, maintenance, testing, setup, or adjustment. During many of these operations, the worker may temporarily be within the robot’s working envelope where unintended operations could result in injuries.

Typical accidents have included the following:

• A robot’s arm functioned erratically during a programming sequence and struck the operator.

• A materials handling robot operator entered a robot’s work envelope during operations and was pinned between the back end of the robot and a safety pole.

• A fellow employee accidentally tripped the power switch while a maintenance worker was servicing an assembly robot. The robot’s arm struck the maintenance worker’s hand. The proper selection of an effective robotic safeguarding system should be based upon a hazard analysis of the robot system’s use, programming, and maintenance operations.

For the planning stage, installation, and subsequent operation of a robot or robot system, one should consider the following safety guidelines from an OSHA technical manual titled “Industrial Robots and Robot System Safety.”

Risk Assessment: At each stage of development of the robot and robot system a risk assessment should be performed. There are different system and personnel safeguarding requirements at each stage. The appropriate level of safeguarding determined by the risk assessment should be applied. In addition, the risk assessments for each stage of development should be documented for future reference.

Safeguarding Devices: Personnel should be safeguarded from hazards associated with the restricted envelope (space) through the use of one or more safeguarding devices:

• Mechanical limiting devices;

• Nonmechanical limiting devices;

• Presence-sensing safeguarding devices;

• Fixed barriers (which prevent contact with moving parts); and

• Interlocked barrier guards.

Awareness Devices: Typical awareness devices include chain or rope barriers with supporting stanchions or flashing lights, signs, whistles, and horns. They are usually used in conjunction with other safeguarding devices.

Safeguarding the Teacher: Special consideration must be given to the teacher or person who is programming the robot. During the teach mode of operation, the person performing the teaching has control of the robot and associated equipment and should be familiar with the operations to be programmed, system interfacing, and control functions of the robot and other equipment.

When systems are large and complex, it can be easy to activate improper functions or sequence functions improperly. Since the person doing the training can be within the robot’s restricted envelope, such mistakes can result in accidents. Mistakes in programming can result in unintended movement or actions with similar results. For this reason, a restricted speed of 250 mm/§ or 10 in/§ should be placed on any part of the robot during training to minimize potential injuries to teaching personnel.

Several other safeguards are suggested in the ANSI/RIA R15.06-1992 standard to reduce the hazards associated with teaching a robotic system.

Operator Safeguards: The system operator should be protected from all hazards during operations performed by the robot. When the robot is operating automatically, all safeguarding devices should be activated, and at no time should any part of the operator’s body be within the robot’s safeguarded area. For additional operator safeguarding suggestions, see the ANSI/RIA R15.06-1992 standard, Section 6.6.

Attended Continuous Operation: When a person is permitted to be in or near the robots restricted envelope to evaluate or check the robots motion or other operations, all continuous operation safeguards must be in force. During this operation, the robot should be at slow speed, and the operator would have the robot in the teach mode and be fully in control of all operations.

Other safeguarding requirements are suggested in the ANSI/RIA R15.06- 1992 standard, Section 6.7.

Maintenance and Repair Personnel: Safeguarding maintenance and repair personnel is very difficult because their job functions are so varied. Troubleshooting faults or problems with the robot, controller, tooling, or other associated equipment is just part of their job. Program touchup is another of their jobs as is scheduled maintenance, and adjustments of tooling, gauges, recalibration, and many other types of functions. While maintenance and repair is being performed, the robot should be placed in the manual or teach mode, and the maintenance personnel perform their work within the safeguarded area and within the robot’s restricted envelope. Additional hazards are present during this mode of operation because the robot system safeguards are not operative.

To protect maintenance and repair personnel, safeguarding techniques and procedures as stated in the ANSI/RIA R15.06-1992 standard, Section 6.8, are recommended.

Maintenance: Should occur during the regular and periodic inspection program for a robot or robot system. An inspection program should include, but not be limited to, the recommendations of the robot manufacturer and manufacturer of other associated robot system equipment such as conveyor mechanisms, parts feeders, tooling, gauges, sensors, and the like.

These recommended inspection and maintenance programs are essential for minimizing the hazards from component malfunction, breakage, and unpredicted movements or actions by the robot or other system equipment. To ensure proper maintenance, it is recommended that periodic maintenance and inspections be documented along with the identity of personnel performing these tasks.

Safety Training: Personnel who program, operate, maintain, or repair robots or robot systems should receive adequate safety training, and they should be able to demonstrate their competence to perform their jobs safely. Employers can refer to OSHA’s publication 2254 (Revised), “Training Requirements in OSHA Standards and Training Guidelines.”

General Requirements: To ensure minimum safe operating practices and safeguards for robots and robot systems covered by this instruction, the following sections of the ANSI/RIA R15.06- 1992 must also be considered:

• Section 6 - Safeguarding Personnel;

• Section 7 - Maintenance of Robots and Robot Systems;

• Section 8 - Testing and Start-up of Robots and Robot Systems; and

• Section 9 - Safety Training of Personnel.

Robots or robotic systems must comply with the following regulations: Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.333, Selection and Use of Work Practices, and OSHA 29 CFR Part 1910.147, The Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout). FSM

© 2010 Facility Safety Management - All Rights Reserved - Get Adobe Reader