|
|
|

Four Reasons, Eight Lessons
Reluctance to Report May Not Be Caused By Fear
BY PHIL LA DUKE
Conventional wisdom holds that people
won’t report near misses because they fear
repercussions associated with admitting
that they screwed up, but in most cases,
conventional wisdom is wrong.
Near misses — incidents where no one
was seriously injured but COULD have
been — provide us with an opportunity to
learn about system failures and correct the
hazards before a catastrophic incident happens.
But people are reticent to report these
mishaps, and organizations lose this opportunity.
Why? Many, if not most safety
professionals land on “people are afraid
they’ll get in trouble,” and while this is
sometimes the case, more often it’s not.
In the past two weeks, I’ve been involved
with three near misses that I did not report. Why? Was I afraid? What was it
about these incidents that made me balk at
reporting them?
In each case I did nothing wrong. In the
first case, I was trying to turn off a light in
a cubicle and as I felt along the bottom of
the light to locate the power switch, I instead
crammed my palm into the plastic
light cover; it hurt, but it didn’t injure me.
Had I been hurrying or had the plastic been
jagged I could have been injured—from a
safety standpoint I could have been cut,
burned or received an electrical shock.
The second near miss was a slip on the
snow walking down concrete steps into a
traffic area. I slipped but managed to grab
the handrail and while I was off-balance I
didn’t fall; so, another near miss.
I did a quick analysis and again, I was
blameless. I wasn’t walking too fast, I was
wearing appropriate footwear, and I was
walking in an area intended for pedestrians.
The steps were sloped down and forward
and being concrete and smooth, the
slightest moisture (never mind ice and
snow) can easily cause a loss of traction.
To further complicate things, there are no
sidewalks from this parking lot to the entrance
forcing people to walk on the snow-covered
grass or in traffic. Not only is an
injury probable, but if an injury does occur,
the incident promises to be severe or
even fatal.
The third near miss involved me catching
the heel of my shoe on a step and
falling forward. In this case, I was also able to catch myself using the rail and felt
only mild discomfort in my knee and ankle.
Things most certainly could have been
much worse but I was lucky. In this case,
as with the others, I was not distracted, I
was following procedures, and I was not
behaving unsafely.
But, I didn’t report any of these near
misses and here’s why:
1. After the first incident, I asked a colleague
if the organization had a near
miss reporting process. She asked me
what that was. Clearly, my safety jargon
was getting in the way so I asked
her differently, “how do we report injuries?”
She explained that there was
a system, but she didn’t know what it
was and that I should ask the department
head. Reason number 1: reporting
a near miss is hard.
2.When I asked the head of the department
about near miss reporting I got the same
general response: I don’t know. When
she asked me why I was inquiring, not
in an accusatory tone, but in more of a
concerned, “Did you want to report
something?” sort of way, I found myself
dismissing the near miss as too trivial
to report (when was the last time
somebody died looking for a
light switch?) Reason number
2: Because there wasn’t any
serious, consequence resulting
from the near miss, it
wasn’t worth reporting.
3. After my near slip on the
ice, I noticed a group of
people talking about the fact
that the lack of side walks
meant that they had to walk
into traffic and that the few
sidewalks that did exist
were slick with ice. I shared
my experience with the icy
steps, and one person responded,
if you call facilities
they tell you that
you have to
fill out
a work
order
and
even when
you do, they don’t do anything.
Reason number 3: Because people believe,
the organization does not value the
information.
4. By the time I caught my heel on the
step and almost fell, I was fully indoctrinated
into a culture that did not report
near misses, but I desperately
wanted to avoid being one of those people
that ignored the problem. I mentally
resolved to find the process and
report these near misses. Then I mentally
walked myself through the scenario
of me reporting these three near
misses and decided that I would look
like: a) an accident-prone klutz, b) I
would be seen as Chicken Little and c)
nothing would be done with the information
anyway. Reason 4: The risk to
reward ratio is stacked against anyone
who reports a near miss.
For the record, this organization has
an amazingly nurturing and employee centric
culture. Employee development
is encouraged and training is a key priority.
And yet I was clearly and quickly
“told” that near miss reporting was not
a priority, not valued, and the organization was not concerned with my
safety, despite none of these things being
true.
So what did I take away? Several things:
1. People feel foolish when they do
something that results in a near miss
even if they did nothing wrong, and
people who feel foolish are unlikely to
advertise it.
2. People will only report a near miss if it is
easy to do so, and ideally, if doing so is
anonymous. Advertising the process is
key.
3. If an organization solicits people to report,
hazards or near misses it had better
be ready to respond quickly and effectively
to the hazard.
4. Even a veteran safety professional is not
immune to peer pressure.
5. The fear of being made to look like a
whiner or a wimp is greater than the desire
to improve the safety of the workplace.
6. You absolutely must have a blame-free
reporting process. If I was reluctant to
report something that happened for
which I was in no way responsible, how much
more reluctant will I be for an incident
where my behavior played a role
in causing the incident?
7. My guess is that near miss reporting
will most likely only happen in cases
where it is virtually impossible not to
report it. This needs to change but unless
near miss reporting is given the
same priority as reporting a serious
injury, we are doomed to a world of
ignorance.
8.We get what we measure. Nobody
seemed very interested in collecting my
information so I was certainly not going
to push it.
Sadly, while we preach a good fight when it comes to near miss
reporting, we don’t do a good job in executing because many of us
start with the assumption that people won’t report near misses
because they are afraid. Until we move beyond that mindset, our
organizations will be at risk and we will continue to underestimate
our risk of serious injuries and fatalities.
FSM
Phil La Duke, a safety consultant, can be reached at
philipladuke@comcast.net.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|